Key Features of the Integration in Pedagogical Education and Teachers’ Professional Development in China
DOI: 10.23951/2782-2575-2023-2-5-20
Introduction. In the current conditions of increasing globalization processes and digital transformation in all spheres of human activities, once-and-for-all education no longer meets society’s requirements for the quality of teaching personnel. In this context, integration in teacher education and professional development of teachers becomes one of the necessary and inevitable tasks of reform and modernization of the education system worldwide, largely due to the growing popularity and demand for the modern educational idea of lifelong learning. The practice of separating the idea of lifelong learning from the system of teacher education has hindered the effective improvement of the quality of teaching personnel. By the end of the XX century, however, China had already begun a comprehensive study of different systems integration, the process of teacher education, and professional development. Since then, there have been some experiences of integrating professional teacher education and development at the level of theory and practice, which need to be generalized and reflected upon. Objective. This study aims to analyze the status of integration trends in modern teacher education and professional development in China, characterize its main features, and identify the main problems. The materials of this study include academic papers on the problem area of the study (mainly Chinese scholars) and regulatory documents approved at the state level on education in China. The following research methods were used: Analysis of academic papers and documents on Chinese education policy, a study of the experience of integration into the teacher education system and professional development of teachers in China, synthesis, and generalization. Results and Discussion. Integration in the system of teacher education and teacher professional development in China enables the rational and reasonable design of the objectives and content of education at all stages of teacher professional development, maintaining its continuity and integrity, optimizing the use of educational resources and teaching materials, and promoting the improvement of the quality of teaching staff. Local authorities, higher education institutions, and teacher professional development institutes are the participants and subjects of this integration and contribute to its implementation in teacher education and professional development. This integration is mainly reflected in the integration of learning objectives, curricula, educational institutions involved in teachers’ professional development, and their certification, as well as in the assessment of educational resources. In the near future, the main tasks of integration in teacher education and teacher training processes in China will remain the promotion of productive professional communication, interaction, and cooperation at all levels of teacher education and among the various subjects of teacher education, the strengthening of the continuity of the goals and content of education, and the improvement of the quality of teachers working in the teacher education system. Conclusion. The main feature of integration in teacher education and teacher professional development in China is to focus on eliminating and reducing gaps in the professional teacher education process and promoting teachers’ continuous professional development. Integration as a resource for improving the quality of teacher education and development can be demonstrated mainly at the levels of the goals in the academic disciplines syllabuses and teacher education programs, educational institutions, teacher certification, and evaluation of educational resources and teaching materials. Eliminating and minimizing the problems and gaps of the above introduction requires further theoretical and empirical research.
Ключевые слова: pedagogical education in China, Chinese teachers, integration, integration in pedagogical education, integration in teacher professional development
Библиография:
1. James E.J.F. Report of Committee of Enquiry into Teacher Education and Training. URL: http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/james/james1972.html (accessed 19 October 2021).
2. 赵中建.国际教育大会第45 届会议的建议. 外国教育资料. 1997. № 6. 4–9页. Zhao Zhongjian. Recommendations of the 45th session of the International Education Conference. Foreign educational materials. 1997;(6):4-9 (In Chinese).
3. Zavalko N.A. Integration processes in the chain “science, higher professional education, production” as the basis for the formation of an effective mechanism for training a competitive specialist. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. 2011;(345):149-152 (In Russian).
4. Shaidullina A.R., Pavlova N.A., MinsabirovaV.N., Burdukovskaya E.A., Yunusova A.B., Letyaev V.A., Afanasev A.S. Integration Processes in Education: Classification of Integration Types. Review of European Studies. 2015;7(4):27-31. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/res.v7n4p27 (accessed 23 December 2022).
5. Makoveeva V.V. Modern approaches to the management of integration processes in the field of higher professional education. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. 2012;(355):115-118 (In Russian).
6. Donetskskaya S.S., Ji Qiannan. Reforming the Higher Education System in China: Modern Results. Higher education in Russia. 2018;27(12):79-92 (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-12-79-92
7. Guruleva T.L. Education system in the People’s Republic of China: structure and main directions of development. Higher education in Russia. 2017;7(214):152-164. (In Russian).
8. 王军. 论作为专业教育的教师教育: 内涵、特征与路径. 教师教育研究. 2019. № 4. 7–15页. Wang Jun. Teacher education as a type of special education: meaning, features and ways. Research of teacher education. 2019;(4):7-15 (In Chinese).
9. 陈金平. 大数据时代的大学英语教师职业发展. 当代外语研究. 2014. № 4. 35–38页. Chen Jinping. Improving the qualifications of English teachers in the era of big data. Modern studies of foreign languages. 2014;(4):35-38 (In Chinese).
10. 钱军平. 从观念到行动:教师教育一体化的困境与出路. 教师教育论坛. 2015. № 9. 19–25页. Qian Junping. Integration in the system of teacher education in China. Forum for Teacher Education. 2015;(9):19-25 (In Chinese).
11. 余莲. 教师教育一体化的现状. 问题与对策. 教师教育论坛. 2013. № 3. 26–31页. Yu Lian. The current situation, problems and countermeasures of the integration of teacher education. Teacher Education.2013;(3):26–31 (In Chinese).
12. 高芳.教师博客:教师专业发展的重要路径. 成人教育. 2010. № 10. 71–72页.Gao Fang. An important path for professional development of teachers. Adult education. 2010;(10):71–72 (In Chinese).
13. 高思超. 教师教育一体化课程建设:逻辑与路向. 西华师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2020. № 5. 68–73页. Gao Sichao. Creation of an integration system of teacher education curricula: logic and direction. Journal of West China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition). 2020;(5):68-73 (In Chinese).
14. 陈春勇.构建新时代教师教育一体化体系:困境与出路.大连教育学院学报. 2020. № 36(03).4–7页. Chen Chunyong. Creation of an integration system of teacher education in a new era: dilemmas and ways out. Bulletin of the Dalian Institute of Education. 2020;36(03):4–7 (In Chinese).
15. 陈时见,李培彤.教师教育一体化的时代内涵与实现路径.教师教育研究. 2020. № 32(02). 1–6页. Chen Shijian, Li Peitong. The meaning of time and the way to implement the integration of teacher education. Teacher Education Research. 2020;32(02):1–6 (In Chinese).
16. 邱秀华.国际教师教育的一体化趋势及其启示. 高教探索. 2005. № 2. 40–43页. Qiu Xiuhua. The trend of integration of international teacher education and its experience. Research of higher education. 2005;(2):40–43 (In Chinese).
17. 荀渊.教师教育一体化改革的回顾与反思 // 教师教育研究. 2004. № 4. 8–12 页.Xun Yuan. Review and Reflections on the Reform of Integration of Teacher education. Teacher Education Research. 2004;(4):8-12 (In Chinese).
18. 饶玮,夏泽胜. 我国教师教育一体化的理论反思与实践路径. 继续教育研究. 2015. № 8. 63–65页. Rao Wei, Xia Zesheng. Theoretical Reflection and a Practical Way of Integration in Teacher Education in China. Research on Continuous Education. 2015;(8):63-65. (In Chinese).
19. 高树仁,宋丹. 区域教育一体化发展的机制创新. 区域教育改革与发展. 2014. № 4. 18–25页. Gao Shuren, Song Dan. Innovation in the mechanism of integration of the development of regional education. Reform and development of regional education. 2014;(9):18–25 (In Chinese).
20. 肖瑶, 陈时见. 教师教育一体化的内涵与实现路径. 教育研究. 2013. № 8. 149–152页. Xiao Yao, Chen Shijian. The connotation and realization path of the integration of teacher education. Educational research, 2013, no. 8, pp.149–152. (In Chinese).
21. 董 吉 贺. 推进教师教育一体化改革的几点建议. 继续教育研究. 2006. № 1. 93–96页. Dong Jihe. Some suggestions for promoting the reform of the integration of teacher education. Research on postgraduate education, 2006, no. 1, pp. 93–96. (In Chinese).
22. 常宝宁. 教师教育一体化:本体特征与核心要素. 当代教育科学. 2013. №18. 3–5页. Chang Baoning. Integration of teacher education: features and basic components. Modern pedagogical sciences. 2013;(18):3-5 (In Chinese).
23. 杨瑞. 论我国现代教师教育一体化实现路径. 继续教育研究. 2016. № 5. 102–104页. Yang Rui. Research on the path to the implementation of the integration of modern teacher education in China. Research of lifelong education. 2016;(5):102-104 (In Chinese).
24. 吕尚兰. 我国教师教育一体化研究探析. 科教导刊. 2010. № 11. 107–109页. Lu Shanglan. Research and analysis of the integration of teacher education in China. Scientific and pedagogical journal. 2010;(11):107-109 (In Chinese).
25. 张贵新, 饶从满. 关于教师教育一体化的认识与思考. 课程.教材.教法. 2002. № 22(4). 58–62页. Zhang Guixin, Rao Congman. Understanding and Reflection on the Integration of teacher education. Curriculum. Educational materials. Teaching method, 2002, no. 22 (4):58–62 (In Chinese).
26. 陶梎生, 谢红星. 高等教育改革与发展. 兰州: 兰州大学出版社, 2007. 441页. Tao Zhesheng, Xie Hongxing. Reform and development of higher education. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University Press, 2007;441 p. (In Chinese).
27. 曾本友. 内在一体化:教师教育一体化的新突破. 学术评论. 2008. № 3. 67–69页. Zeng Benyou. Internal integration: a new breakthrough in the integration of teacher education. Academic review. 2008;(3):67-69 (In Chinese).
28. 刘益春, 李广, 高夯. “U-G-S”教师教育模式实践探索 – 以“教师教育创新东北实验区”建设为例. 教育研究. 2014. № 8. 107– 112页. Liu Yichun, Li Guang, Gao Hang. “U-G-S” Teacher Education Model Practice Exploration – Taking the Construction of “Teacher Education Innovation North-east Experimental Zone” as an example. Educational Research. 2014;(8):107-112 (In Chinese).
29. 余桥, 林群, 吴节义. 教师教育一体化过程中的问题分析与策略初探. 绵阳师范学院学报. 2009. № 12. 123–126页. Yu Qiao, Lin Qun, Wu Jieyi. Research on the problems and methods of solution in the process of integrating teacher education. Journal of the Mianyang Pedagogical University. 2009;(12):123-126 (In Chinese).
30. 徐莉. 对我国教师在职培训现存问题的思考. 教师教育研究. 2004. № 4. 21–25页. Xu Li. Reflections on the existing problems of professional development of teachers in China. Research of pedagogical education. 2004;(4):21-25 (In Chinese).
Выпуск: 2, 2023
Серия выпуска: Issue 2
Рубрика:
Страницы: 5 — 20
Скачиваний: 232