|
DESCRIPTION OF THE GRAMMATICAL MEANS OF FOCALIZATION IN THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE TO TEACH INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS HOW TO CREATE LITERATURE REVIEW
DOI: 10.23951/2782-2575-2023-1-82-96
The article deals with grammatical means used by the speaker to indicate the source of information when forming an utterance whose purpose is to convey the information obtained in communicative acts prior to a particular communicative act. It will be shown that these grammatical devices, belonging to different departments of the language system, are not fully characterized in the scientific and methodological literature and, in particular, in the official documents regulating the teaching of Russian to international students. For international students, using grammatical means to indicate the source of information in the productive language, for example, when writing a literature review for a master’s thesis, poses a significant difficulty. However, it is possible to fill the existing gap in the applied description of the language system (its fragment) based on the research results in theoretical linguistics. In order to determine the place of grammatical means of indicating the source of information in the language system, the authors refer to the concept of communicative grammar by G.A. Zolotova to the terms “focalization” and “means of focalization” proposed within the framework of this concept. Following G.A. Zolotova, the grammatical means of focalization are classified according to the type of interaction between the model of the source text and the chosen model for conveying information in the created literature review. Considering the system of focalization in the Russian language from the point of view of theoretical linguistics, the tasks of their study and description are formulated from the linguistic-didactic aspect and scientifically justified for language teaching.
Ключевые слова: Russian for academic purposes, source work, formal means of focalization, reporting verbs, reporting clauses, writing skills for research work
Библиография:
1. Hyland Ken, Fang Kevin Jiang. Text-organizing metadiscourse: Tracking changes in rhetorical persuasion. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 138–165. URL: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/69402/1/Accepted_manuscript.pdf (accessed 15 January 2021).
2. Hyland Кen. Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of pragmatics. May 2017;113:16-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
3. Charles M. Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpusbased study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes. 2006;25(3):310-331.
4. Swales J.M., Feak C.B. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential tasks and skills, Second Edition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 2004.
5. Andryushina N.P. et al. Trebovaniya po russkomu yazyku kak inostrannomu. Pervyy uroven’. Obshcheye vladeniye. Vtoroy variant [Requirements for Russian as a foreign language. The first level. Common proficiency. Second version]. 2nd ed. Moscow-St. Petersburg, Zlatoust Publ., 2009. 32 p. (in Russian). URL: https://gct.msu.ru/docs/B1_trebovaniyat.pdf (accessed 15 January 2021).
6. Andryushina N.P. et al. Gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart po russkomu yazyku kak inostrannomu. Professional’nye moduli. Pervyy uroven’. Vtoroy uroven’ [State educational standard for Russian as a foreign language. Professional modules. The first level. The second leve]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Zlatoust Publ., 2000. 56 p. (in Russian).
7. Zolotova G.A. Ocherk funktsional’nogo sintaksisa russkogo yazyka [Essay on the functional syntax of the Russian language]. 2nd ed. Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2005. 352 p. (in Russian).
8. Grekova O.K., Akbaba Tyulay. Protsess peredachi informatsii: yazykovyye sredstva oboznacheniya v kurse russkogo yazyka kak inostrannogo [Information transmission process: language means of designation in the course of Russian as a foreign language]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2019;8(205):128-134. DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-8-128-135 (in Russian).
9. Khavronina S.A., Balykhina T.M. Innovatsionnyy uchebno-metodicheskiy kompleks “Russkiy yazyk kak inostrannyy”: Uchebnoye posobiye [Innovative educational and methodological complex “Teaching RFL: textbook”]. Moscow, RUDN, 2008:344 p. (in Russian).
10. Zolotova G.A. Sintaksicheskiy slovar’. Repertuar elementarnykh edinits russkogo sintaksisa [Syntactic dictionary. Repertoire of elementary syntactic units in the Russian language]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2001. 440 p. (in Russian).
11. Vsevolodova M.V. Ob odnom klasse imennykh sintaksem (u + rod.p.) [On the group of noun syntaxemes (у + Genitive)]. In: Kommunikativno-smyslovye parametry grammatiki i teksta [Communicative and semantic parameters of grammar and text]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2002:101-108 (in Russian).
12. Zolotova G.A., Onipenko N.K., Sidorova M.Yu. Kommunikativnaya grammatika russkogo yazyka [Communicative grammar of the Russian language]. Moscow, Moscow University Publ., 2004:544 p. (in Russian).
13. Paducheva E.V. Predikatnye imena v leksikograficheskom aspekte [Predicate names in lexicographic aspect]. In: Stat’i raznykh let [Articles from different years]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur Publ., 2009:317-338 (in Russian).
14. Rozhkova G.I. K lingvisticheskim osnovam metodiki prepodavaniya russkogo yazyka inostrantsam [Linguistic foundations for teaching the RFL]. Moscow, Moscow University Publ., 1983:125 p. (in Russian).
15. Zakhrai S.Kh., Sidorova M.Yu. Avtorizatsiya kak problema vybora padezha: sistemnost’ russkogo sintaksisa i problemy obucheniya RKI [Authorization as the Problem of the Choice of Case: System of Russian Syntax and the Problems of Teaching RFL]. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federal’nogo universiteta. Filologicheskiye nauki – Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology. 2020;(1):198–207 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18522/1995-0640-2020-1-198-206
16. Shin J., Velázquez A.J., Swatek A., Staples Sh. Examining the Effectiveness of Corpus-Informed Instruction of Reporting Verbs in L2 First-Year College Writing. L2 Journal. 2018;10(3). DOI: 10.5070/L210337022
17. Kwon M.H., Staples S., Partridge R.S. Source work in the first-year L2 writing classroom: Undergraduate L2 writers’ use of reporting verbs. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. July 2018;34:86-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.04.001
18. Jarkovská M., Kučírková L. Citation practices in EFL academic writing: The use of reporting verbs in Master’s thesis literature reviews. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2020;10(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.29033
19. Wierzbicka A. Metatekst v tekste [Metatext in the Discourse]. Novoye v zarubezhnoy lingvistike [New in foreign linguistics]. Issue VIII. Nikolaeva T.M. (ed.). Moscow, Progress Publ., 1978:402-421 (in Russian).
20. Vsevolodova M.V. Teoriya funktsional’no-kommunikativnogo sintaksisa: fragment fundamental’noy prikladnoy (pedagogicheskoy) modeli yazyka [A theory of functional and communicative syntax: a fragment of the fundamental applied (pedagogical) language model]. Мoscow, URSS Publ., 2016:649 p. (in Russian).
( 451.51 kB ) 
( 440.75 kB )
Выпуск: 1, 2023
Серия выпуска: Issue 1
Рубрика:
Страницы: 82 — 96
Скачиваний: 273