|
THE STRUCTURE OF LANGUAGE COMPETENCE FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE METASYSTEM APPROACH
DOI: 10.23951/2782-2575-2023-3-52-67
The article analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the existing approaches to defining the concept of linguistic competence. A proposed classification organizes the variety of competencies associated with language use. The author’s conception of the organization of linguistic competence at the structural level as a psychological and pedagogical phenomenon is presented from the theoretical and methodological positions of the Metasystematic approach as the most modern version of the systematic approach to date. Five levels of the system of linguistic competence were identified: Metasystem, System-wide, Subsystem, Component, and Elementary. It is stated that the content of the highest metasystem level of linguistic competence is a holistic linguistic ability consisting of communicative, lexical-semantic, grammatical, and regulatory subsystems. The regulatory system is most important to the functioning of linguistic competence, which is an activity invariant of the self-regulatory processes of goal formation, prediction, decision-making, planning, programming, control, and self-control. The embedding of the level of the metasystem in the underlying levels of the system determines the specifics of its content, which is represented by different ways of dealing with language knowledge: Language Reflection, Language Intuition, Language Knowledge, and Language Skills. In order to verify the model of the structural level of language competence, an empirical study was conducted with a sample of 94 second-grade students of a general education school. The methods used were tests of language and speech development, which are widely used in psychological and pedagogical practice, and the method developed by the author to study the peculiarities of a student’s language awareness when working with quasi-linguistic constructions. The methods of interview, structured observation, and expert assessment were used. The study confirms the validity of the authors’ theoretical ideas. The obtained theoretical and empirical results can be used to clarify the goals, purposes, and methods of language teaching and psychological and pedagogical support of this process at all levels of language teaching.
Ключевые слова: linguistic competence, language knowledge, language intuition, language reflection, systematic approach, metasystematic approach, language learning
Библиография:
1. Mil'rud R.P. Kompetentnost’ v yazykovom obrazovanii [Competence in language education]. Vestnik Tambovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki – Bulletin of Tambov State University. Humanities Series. 2003;2(30):100-106. (In Russian).
2. Bozhovich E.D. Razvitie yazykovoy kompetentsii shkol’nikov: problemy i podkhody [Development of the linguistic competence of schoolchildren: problems and approaches]. Voprosy psykhologii – Questions of psychology. 1997;(1):33-44. (In Russian).
3. Bozhovich E.D. Razvitie yazykovoy kompetentsii kak psikhologicheskoi sistemy (na materiale russkogo yazyka kak rodnogo). Dis. dokt. psikhol. nauk [Development of linguistic competence as a psychological system (on the material of Russian as a native language). Dis. doc. psychol. sciences]. Moscow, 2016:450 p. (In Russian).
3. Khomskii N. Aspekty teorii sintaksisa [Aspects of the theory of syntax]. Moscow, Publishing House of State University, 1972:252 p. (In Russian).
5. Neumaier O. The problem of criteria for linguistic competence. In: Neumaier O. (Ed. by) Mind, language and society. Vienna, WVGÖ, 1984:85-102.
6. Hymes D. On communicative competence. In: Pride J.B., Holmes J. (Eds.) Sociolinguistics: Selected readings. Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1972:269-293.
7. Canale M., Swain M. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics. 1980;1(1):1–47.
8. Bachman L.F., Palmer A.S. The Construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency. TESOL Quarterly. 1982;16(4):449-465.
9. Savignon S.J. Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1983:340 p.
10. Zimnyaya I.A. Kompetentsiya i kompetentnost' v kontekste kompetentnostnogo podkhoda v obrazovanii [Competence and competence in the context of the competence-based approach in education]. Inostrannye yazyki v shkole – Foreign languages at school. 2012(6):2-11. (In Russian).
11. Smirnova E.A. Formirovaniye kommunikativnoy kompetentnosti studentov v usloviyakh nepreryvnogo obrazovaniya. Dis. dokt. ped. nauk [Formation of students’ communicative competence in continuous education. Dis. Dr. teacher. sciences]. Moscow, 2007:341 p. (In Russian).
12. Karpov A.V. Metasistemnaya organizatsiya individual'nykh kachestv lichnosti [Metasystem organization of individual personality traits]. Yaroslavl’, Publishing House of YarSU, 2018:744 p. (In Russian).
13. Professionalizm sovremennogo pedagoga: metodika otsenki urovnya kvalifikatsii pedagogicheskikh rabotnikov [Professionalism of a modern teacher: a methodology for assessing the level of qualification of pedagogical workers]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2011:168 p. (In Russian).
14. Ananiev B.G. Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya [Man as a subject of knowledge]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2001:288 p. (In Russian).
15. Barabanshchikov V.A. Sistemnost’. Vospriyatiye. Obscheniye [Consistency. Perception. Communication]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2004:480 p. (In Russian).
16. Lomov B.F. Metodologicheskiye i teoreticheskiye problem psykhologii [Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1999:350 p.
17. Shadrikov V.D. Psikhologiya deyatel’nosti cheloveka [Psychology of human activity]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2013:419 p. (In Russian).
18. Karpov A.V. Psykhologiya refleksivnykh mekhanizmov deyatel’nosti [Psychology of reflexive mechanisms of activity]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2004:450 p. (In Russian).
19. Razina T.V. Structurno-funktsional’naya organizatsiya i genesis motivatsii nauchnoy deyatel’nosti. Dis. dokt. psikhol. nauk [Structural and functional organization and the genesis of the motivation of scientific activity: author. dis. doc. psychol. Sciences]. Yaroslavl, 2016:49 p. (In Russian).
20. Levchenko V.V. Social’naya psikhologiya sostyazatel’nosti: metasistemnyy podkhod. Avtoref. dis. dokt. psikhol. nauk [Social psychology of competitiveness: Metasystematic approach. Author. dis. doc. psychol. Sciences. Perm, 2017:40 p. (In Russian).
21. Karpov A.V., Chernov D.N. Strukturnaya organizatsiya yazykovoy kompetentnosti [Structural organization of linguistic competence]. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik – Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2022;(6):132-139. (In Russian).
22. Karpov A.V., Shadrikov V.D. Integral'naya kontseptsiya sistemogeneza deyatel'nosti [Integral concept of activity system genesis[.Moscow, Izd. dom RAO, 2017:352 p. (in Russian).
23. Kabardov M. K., Artsishevskaya E. V. Tipy yazykovykh i kognitivnykh sposobnostyey i kompetentsii [Types of language and cognitive abilities and competence]. Voprosy psykhologii – Questions of Psychology. 1996;(1):34-49. (In Russian).
24. Kabardov M. K. Yazykovye sposobnosti: Psikhologiya, psikhofiziologiya, pedagogika [Language abilities: Psychology, psychophysiology, pedagogy]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2013. 399 p. (in Russian).
25. Ushakova T. N. Dvoistvennost' prirody recheyazykovoi sposobnosti [The duality of the nature of speech-language ability]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – Psychological Journal. 2004;25(2):5-12. (In Russian).
26. Ushakova T. N. Psikholingvistika: Uchebnik dlya vuzov [Psycholinguistics: Textbook for universities]. Moscow, PER SE Publ., 2006:416 p. (in Russian).
27. Mikhailova N.B. Adaptirovannuy variant Geydel’bergskogo testa rechevogo razvitiya detyey [Adapted version of the Heidelberg test of speech development of children]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – Psychological Journal. 1990;11(6):105-112. (In Russian).
28. Fodor J.A., Katz J.J. The Structure of Language, Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1964:612 p.
29. Jackendoff R.S. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press Classics, 1972:400 p.
30. Pustejovsky J. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, The MIT Press, 1995:312 p.
31. Konopka A.E., Bock K. Lexical or syntactic control of sentence formulation? Structural generalizations from idiom production. Cognitive Psychology. 2009;58(1):68-101.
32. Mahowald K. Fedorenko E., Piantadosi S.T., Gibson E. Info/information theory: Speakers choose shorter words in predictive contexts. Cognition. 2013;126(2):313-318.
33. Rezaii N., Mahowald K., Ryskin R., Dickerson B., Gibson E. A syntax-lexicon trade-off in language production. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2022;119(25):e2120203119.
34. Yacobson R.O. Yazyk i bessoznatel’noye [Language and the unconscious]. Moscow, Gnosis Publ., 1996:248 p.
35. Gokhlerner M.M., Eiger G.V. Psikhologicheskii mekhanizm chuvstva yazyka [Psychological mechanism of language feeling]. Voprosy psikhologi. – Questions of psychology. 1983;(4):137-142. (In Russian).
36. Shcherba L.V. O troyakom aspekte yazykovykh yavleniy i ob eksperimente v yazykoznanii [On the triple aspect of linguistic phenomena and on the experiment in linguistics]. In: Yazykovaya sistema i rechevayadyeyatel’nost’ [Language system and speech activity]. Moscow, Komkniga Publ., 2007:24-39. (In Russian).
37. Berko J. The child’s learning of English morphology. Word. 1958;14:150-177.
38. Chernov D.N. Vliyanie stilya detsko-roditel’skikh otnosheniy na obuchenie mladshikh shkol’nikov [Influence of the style of parent-child relations on the education of younger schoolchildren]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya – Cultural-Historical Psychology. 2009;(1):74-84.
39. Chernov D.N. Sravnitel’nyy analiz rezul’tativnosti individual’noy i grupovoy form yazykovogo obucheniya v zone blizhayshego razvitiya v srednem shkol’nom vozraste [Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of individual and group forms of language learning in the zone of proximal development in middle school age]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya – Cultural-Historical Psychology. 2022;18(4):70-79.
( 883.01 kB ) 
( 697.19 kB )
Выпуск: 3, 2023
Серия выпуска: Issue 3
Рубрика:
Страницы: 52 — 67
Скачиваний: 217