|
On the strategic priorities of modern education in the face of global challenges
DOI: 10.23951/2782-2575-2024-2-5-21
Humanity faces global challenges caused by geopolitical, economic, environmental, and other circumstances. This situation is exacerbated by the crisis pursued by the West for decades, the policy of globalization and multiculturalism. Since education is an inert system that cannot set strategic priorities for its development, it is always forced to focus on solving current problems of the past and present. As a result, education’s role in shaping humanity’s future is indirect rather than purposeful, often leading to local and large-scale undesirable disasters. The historical and cultural analysis of the situation in Russia and the countries of Western civilization made it possible to identify serious challenges that cannot be solved without the active participation of education. The first is related to the fact that in the conditions of current globalization, a new crusade of Western civilization is taking place to spread its traditions and values in the world, which are presented as universal. Modern research, historical examples, and the negative experiences of our times show that what is acceptable for some nations often becomes destructive and disastrous for others. Therefore, the first strategic priority of modern education should be to help adolescents and specific peoples understand their cultural identity, develop a respectful attitude towards other peoples’ cultures, and, on this basis, engage in productive intercultural dialogue. Another global challenge is the energy and environmental situation and the consumer psychology imposed on people from childhood, typical of Western countries, post-Soviet states, and today’s Russia. All this threatens the preservation of life on Earth in the future. In the history of humankind, two periods can be distinguished in which humans were on the brink of extinction. Each time, they were saved by finding the strength to consciously change their way of life and themselves based on commonly accepted and shared values and taboos, i.e., they showed themselves to be rational and equal spiritual beings. This aspect is insufficiently reflected in the regulation documents on education adopted in Russia and the world in recent years. Therefore, the second strategic priority of modern education should be the development of people’s environmental consciousness and the recognition of the priority of spiritual needs over material needs.
Ключевые слова: strategic priorities of modern education, global challenges of our time, cultural identity, freedom, consumer psychology, crisis of modern education, competency-based approach
Библиография:
1. Subetto A.I. Nauchno-obrazovatel’noye obshchestvo – strategiya razvitiya nauki, obrazovaniya i kultury v Rossii XXI veka i osnova perekhoda k upravlyaemomu noosfernomu razvitiyu [Scientific-educationalsociety – strategy of science, education and culture development in Russia of the XXI century and the basis for transition to controlled noospheric development]. Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. 2017;(1(37)):18-32 (in Russian).
2. Averin A.N., Revyagina N.G., Kondratenko E.N., Golubeva M.O. Natsionalnyy proekt po obrazovaniyu o dostizhenii natsionalnykh tseley – obespecheniye globalnoy konkurentnosposobnosti rossiyskogo obrazovaniya i vospitaniye lichnosti [The National Project on Education on Achieving National Goals – Ensuring Global Competitiveness of Russian Education and Personal Upbringing]. Nauka i obrazovaniye: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatelstvo; pravo i upravleniye. 2019:(3(106)):128-131 (in Russian).
3. Pisarchik A.S. Opredelenie natsionalnykh i vneshnepoliticheskikh priоritetov gosudarstva v usloviyakh rasprostraneniya globalnykh vyzovov [Definingthe national and foreign policy priorities of the state in the context of the spread of global challenges]. In: Nauchnye trudy respublikanskogo instituta vysshey shkoly. Filosofsko-gumanitarnye nauki [Scientific works of the Republican Institute of Higher School. Philosophical and humanities]. 2018;(17):15-158 (in Russian).
4. Pevzner M.N., Petryakov P.A., Donina I.A., Ushanova I.A. Metodologicheskiye osnovaniya proektirovaniya modeley upravleniya mnogoobraziem v obrazovatel’ykh sistemakh [Methodological bases for designing models of diversity management in educational systems]. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya. 2019;(63-1):231-335 (in Russian).
5. Osipov A.M., Karstanye P., Tumalev V.V., Zarubin V.G. O sotsial’nom partnyorstve v sfere obrazovaniya [On social partnership in the field of education]. Sotsiolodicheskiye issledovaniya – Sociological Research. 2008;(11(295)):108-115.
6. Aslanov I.K. Teoriya kul’turno istoricheskikh tipov N.Ya. Danilevskogo [Theory of cultural and historical types N.Ya. Danilevsky]. Filosofiya i obshchvo – Philosophy and Society. 2002;(1(26)):164-180 (in Russian).
7. Spinoza B. Pis’mo G.G. Schulleru [Letter to G.G. Schuller]. In: Izbrannyye proizvedeniya: v 2 t. [Selected works: in 2 volumes]. Vol. 2. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1957:592 (in Russian).
8. Ivanov E.V. O nekotorykh sotsial’no-filosofskikh i pedagogicheskik aspektakh svobody [On some socio-philosophical and pedagogical aspects of freedom]. Vestnik novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of the Novgorod State University. 2011;(64):35-36 (in Russian).
9. Subetto A.I. “My – russkiye, kakoy vostorg!”: nauchno-filosofskoye esse [“We are Russians, what a delight!”: scientific and philosophical essay]. St. Petersburg, Asterion Publ., 2022:56 p. (in Russian).
10. Pevzner M.N., Petryakov P.A. Ot mnogoobraziya pedagogicheskikh kontseptov k pedagogike i menedzhmentu mnogoobraziya: stanovleniye metateorii mnogoobraziya v rossiyskoy pedagogicheskoy nauke [From Diversity of Pedagogical Concepts to Diversity Pedagogy and Management: Formation of Diversity Metatheory in Russian Pedagogical Science]. Nepreryvnoye obrazovaniye: XXI vek, 2016, no. 3 (15), pp. 2–11 (in Russian).
11. Ivanov E.V. Fenomen svobody v pedagogike Zapadnoy Evropy i Rossii [The Phenomenon of Freedom in Pedagogy of Western Europe and Russia]. Veliky Novgorod, NovGU Publ., 2013. 380 p. (in Russian).
12. Stepanov S.S. Vyzovy i ugrozy Rossii v global’nom mire so storony sistemy obrazovaniya v aspekte natsionalnoy bezopasnosti [Challenges and Threats to Russia in the Global World from the Education System in the Aspect of National Security]. Vestnik MNEPU. 2015;7:293-317 (in Russian).
13. Startsev A.A. Globa’nye vyzovy, ugrozy i prioritety natsional’noy ekologicheskoy politiki [Global challenges, threats and priorities of the national environmental policy]. Chistaya voda: problemy i resheniya. 2009;(1):33-36 (in Russian).
14. Maksyutina E.V. Izmenyayushchiysya mir truda: vyzovy global’noy ekonomiki [The Changing World of Work: Challenges of the Global Economy]. Regional’nyy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. 2014;(3-4(7-8)):47-53 (in Russian).
15. Maksakov A.D., Maksakova V.I. Pedagogicheskaya antropologiya: uchebnoye posobiye dlya vuzov [Pedagogical anthropology: textbook for universities]. Мoscow, Yurayt Publ., 2023:293 p. (in Russian).
16. Kuznetsov I.M. Tsennostnye orientiry i sotsial’no-politicheskiye ustanovki rossiyan [Value orientations and socio-political attitudes of Russians]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya – Sociological Stusies. 2017;(1):47-55.
17. Natsional’nyy proyekt “Obrazovaniye” [National project “Education”]. In: Website of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation. URL:https://edu.gov.ru/nationalproject (access date: 02/01/2024) (in Russian).
18. Solov’eva T.S. Globalnye vyzovy rossiyskoy sistemy obrazovaniya [Global Challenges of the Russian Education System]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2019;(9(431)):201-209 (in Russian).
19. Zimnyaya I.A. Klyuchevye kompetentsii – novaya paradigma rezultata obrazovaniya [Key competencies – a new paradigm of educational outcome]. Eksperiment i innovatsii v shkole. 2009;(2):7-14 (in Russian).
20. Khutorskoy A.V. Kompetentnostnyy podkhod v obuchenii: nauchno-metodicheskoye posobiye [Competency-based approach in teaching: scientificand methodological manual]. Мoscow, Eydos Publ., 2013. 73 p. (in Russian).
21. Ivanov E. V. Ob istokakh sushchnosti idei otkrytosti v obrazovanii [On the origins and essence of the idea of openness in education]. In: Otkrytoye v obrazovaniye: ot otkrytiya professii k mezhdunarodnomu sotrudnichestvu [Open education: from opening a profession to international cooperation]. Vitebsk, VSU named after. P.M. Masherova Publ., 2023:14-18 (in Russian).
22. Timokhina G.S., Popova O.I., Izakova N.B. Modelirovaniye tsifrovogo imidzha prepodavatelya vuza [Modeling the digital image of a university teacher]. Integratsiya obrazovaniya – Integration of Education. 2022;26(4):613-636 (in Russian).
( 349.61 kB ) 
( 340.79 kB )
Выпуск: 2, 2024
Серия выпуска: Issue 2
Рубрика:
Страницы: 5 — 21
Скачиваний: 136