|
VISUALIZATION OF CULTURE: EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS
DOI: 10.23951/2782-2575-2021-2-18-35
The authors of the article focus on changes related to education. Education is considered as a communicative construct arising from the process of symbolic interaction between individuals who establish meanings when coordinating their statements. The communicative generation of situations and orders of knowledge is interpreted as educational semiosis. Analyzed is the discourse of modern humanities which are competing with each other in determining the current socio-cultural situation. Highlighted is the research tendency, asserting the point of changing the cultural morphogenesis by means of its visualization processes. Based on this, the hypothesis of a gap between culture and education is put forward. According to this hypothesis, cultural relations are increasingly mediated by figurative participation, while educational practices appeal to verbal and textual forms of the situational mediation. Within the relations between actors in education, this is reflected in the dominance of legitimate (metanarrative) samples, the transmission model of educational knowledge, the communicative preference for orderliness, the desire for unambiguity, the clarity and completeness of logocentric forms of thinking, and so on. The change of the mediation form in the organization of educational interaction and the transition from the verbocentric order to the ocular-centric one, is suggested as a step in the development of modern education. It must affect the way educational relations (educational communication) function, the way words (speech) and images (vision) are inter-related, the principles of students’ orientation in their attitudes to the sign-symbolic world, their partners in interaction, and to themselves. In the first case, the point is to organize educational communication based on the principles of paradoxicality, paralogicality, and disproportionality of statements and images of the situation. Here the most important educational objective is to make the participants of the educational interaction consider their differences in their interpretations of the world, their styles of utterance, and their discursive positioning. In the second case, the educational objective is the liberalization of vision, which emerges in the course of perceptual work emancipated from the primary procedures of interpretation and comprehension of the visible and relying on the action of the image as the context of the statement. The third case is about worldview constants, radical changes in the position of the educational subject, acquiring the experience of self-detachment in learning. In the final analysis, this provides an opportunity for differentiation and diversification of the worlds of human presence.
Keywords: visualization of culture, orders of culture and education, sign-symbolic mediation of educational relations, educational semiosis, communicative design of educational interaction
References:
1. Thomas, William I. The Unadjusted Girl. Personality. Culture. Society. 3 (50) (2009): 61–78. (In Russian)
2. Lacan, Jacques. Fonction et champ de la parole et du langage en psychanalyse [Function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis]. La psychanalyse. 1 (1956): 81–166. (In French)
3. Płaneta, Filip. Św. Augustyn a prezentyzm [St. Augustine and presentism]. Nauki ścisłe. 18 (2019): 29–36. (In Polish)
4. Sztompka, Piotr. Socjologia wizualna. Fotografia jako metoda badawcza [Visual Sociology. Photography as a Research Method]. Warsaw: PWN Publ., 2005. (In Polish)
5. McLuhan, Herbert M. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (Russ. ed.: McLuhan, Herbert M. Ponimanie media: vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka [Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man]. Moscow: Kuchkovo pole, 2003). (In Russian)
6. Barthes, Roland. Rhétorique de l’image [Rhetoric of the Image]. In: Barthes, R. Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics. Moscow: Progress, 1994: 297–318. (In Russian)
7. Nancy, Jean-Luc. Pli deleuzien de la pensee [Deleuzian Fold of Thought]. Vita cogitans 5 (2007): 149–156. (In Russian)
8. Mirzoeff, Nicholas. How to See the World (Russ. ed.: Mirzoeff, Nicholas. Kak smotret’ na mir [How to See the World]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press; Garazh, 2019). (In Russian)
9. Mazepa-Domagala, Beata & Wilk, Teresa. Edukacja w zakresie sztuk wizualnych, czyli o przygotowaniu dzieci w młodszym wieku szkolnym do odbioru i kreowania otaczającej je ikonosfery [Education in the Field of Visual Arts, or about Preparing Children at a Younger School age to Receive and Create the Surrounding Iconosphere]. Chowanna 2 (45) (2015): 89–104. (In Polish)
10. Ogonowska, Agnieszka Kultura, komunikacja i kompetencja wizualna w kontekście wybranych zagadnień wspуłczesnej humanistyki [Culture, communication and visual competence in the context of selected issues of contemporary humanities]. In: Komunikologia. Teoria i praktyka komunikacji [Communication. Communication theory and practice]. Ed. Emanuel Kulczycki, Michał Wendland. Poznań: UAM Publ., 2012: 53–67. (In Polish)
11. Bernstein, Basil. Socjolingwistyka a społeczne problemy kształcenia [Sociolinguistics and Social Problems of Education]. In: Język i społeczeństwo [Language and Society]. Ed. Michał Głowiński. Warszawa: Czytelnik, 1980. 83–117. (In Polish)
12. Latour, Bruno. Vizualizacija i poznanie: izobrazhaja veshhi vmeste [Visualization and Cognition: Drawing Things Together]. Logos. Vol. 27, 2 (2017): 95–156. (In Russian)
13. Melosik, Zbyszko & Szkudlarek, Tomasz. Kultura, tożsamość i edukacja: migotanie znaczeń [Culture, Identity and Education: the Flickering of Meanings]. Krakow: Impuls, 2009. (In Polish)
14. Lyotard, Jean-François. La condition postmoderne. Rapport sur le savoir [The Postmodern Condition. Knowledge Report]. Les éditions de minuit, 1979. (Russ. ed.: Lyotard, Jean-François. Sostoyanie postmoderna [The postmodern condition]. St. Petersburg: Aleteyya, 1998). (In Russian)
15. Mitchell, William John Thomas. Iconology. Image. Text. Ideology (Russ. ed.: Mitchell, W.J.T. Ikonologija. Obraz. Tekst. Ideologija. Moscow: Ekaterinburg:Kabinetnyj uchenyj, 2017). (In Russian)
16. Juszczyk, Stanislaw. Kultura wizualna – wybrane studia teoretyczne oraz badania empiryczne [Visual Culture – Selected Theoretical Studies and Empirical Studies]. Chowanna 2 (45) (2015): 17–30. (In Polish)
17. Kawecki, Witold. Od kultury wizualnej do teologii wizualnej [From Visual Culture to Visual Theology]. Kultura – Media – Teologia 1 (2010): 24–33. (In Polish)
18. Schnettler, Bernt. W stronę socjologii wiedzy wizualnej [Towards the Sociology of Visual Knowledge]. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej [Review of Qualitative Sociology] 3 (2008): 116–142. (In Polish)
19. Mitchell, William John Thomas. Iconology. Image. Text. Ideology (Russ. ed.: Mitchell, W.J.T. Ikonologija. Obraz. Tekst. Ideologija. Moscow: Ekaterinburg:Kabinetnyj uchenyj, 2017). (In Russian)
20. Szkudlarek, Tomasz. Semiotics of Identity: Politics and Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education (2011): 113–125.
21. Baudrillard, Jean. Simulacres et Simulation [Simulacra and Simulation]. Paris: Galilée, 1981. (Russ. ed.: Baudrillard, Jean. Simulyakryi i simulyatsiya [Simulacra and Simulation]. Tula: Postum, 2013). (In Russian)
22. Inishev, Ilya. Raspredelennaya obraznost: imaginativnyie praktiki sovremennoy kulturyi [Distributed imagery: imaginative practices of contemporary culture]. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemyi vizualnoy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problems of visual semiotics. 1 (2020): 31–46. (In Russian)
23. Szkudlarek, Tomasz. Media. Szkic z filozofii i pedagogiki dystansu [Media. A Essay of Philosophy and Pedagogy of Distance]. Krakow: Impuls, 2009. (In Polish)
24. Klus-Stanska, Dorota. Wiedza, która zniewala – transmisyjne tradycje w szkolnej edukacji [Subjugating Knowledges – Transmissional Traditions in School Education]. Forum oświatowe 1 (46) (2012): 21–40. (In Polish)
25. Klus-Stanska, Dorota. Edukacja szkolna bez sztuki: w stronę destrukcji poznawczej podmiotowości dziecka [School Education without the Art: Towards the Destruction of the Cognitive Subjectivity of the Child]. In: Szatan E., Muzioł E. A., Komorowska-Zielony A. Emil Jaques-Dalcroze i jego idee w edukacji, sztuce i terapii [Emil Jaques-Dalcroze and his Ideas in Education, Art and Therapy]. Gdansk: WUG, 2016: 241–260. (In Polish)
26. Bergson, Henri. Essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience [Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness]. Paris, 1889. (Russ. ed.: Bergson, Henri. Opyt o neposredstvennykh dannykh soznaniya. Moscow: Moskovskiy klub, 1992). (In Russian)
27. Bal, Mieke. Visual essentialism and the object of visual culture. Journal of Visual Culture 2 (2003): 5–32. (Russ. ed.: Bal, Mieke. Vizualnyiy essentsializm i ob’ekt vizualnyih issledovaniy [Visual essentialism and the object of visual culture]. Logos 1 (2012): 212–249). (In Russian)
28. Schütz, Alfred. Izbrannoe: Mir, svetyaschiysya smyislom [Selected: The World Glowing With Meaning]. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2004. (In Russian)
29. Davydov, Basil. Teoriya razvivayuschego obucheniya [Theory of developing education]. Moscow: INTOR, 1996. (In Russian)
30. Ryle, Gilbert. The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949. (Russ. ed.: Ryle, Gilbert. Ponyatie soznaniya [The concept of mind]. Moscow: Ideya-Press, 1999). (In Russian)
31. Arendt, Hannah. The Life of the Mind. Boston: Mariner Books, 1981. (Russ. ed.: Arendt, Hannah. Zhizn uma [The Life of the Mind]. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2013). (In Russian)
32. Vekker, Lev. Psihicheskie protsessyi [Mental processes]. Vol. 1. Leningrad: Leningrad University Publ., 1974. (In Russian)
33. Mitchell, William John Thomas. What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
34. Barthes, Roland. Le Plaisir du texte [Pleasure of the Text]. In: Barthes, R. Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics. Moscow: Progress, 1994с: 462–518. (In Russian)
35. Bernstein, Basil. Class, Codes and Control: The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Psychology Press, 2003. (Russ. ed.: Bernstein, Basil. Klass, kodyi i kontrol: struktura pedagogicheskogo diskursa [Class, Codes and Control: The structuring of pedagogic discourse]. Moscow: Prosveschenie, 2008). (In Russian)
36. Strzemiński, Władysław. Teoria widzenia [Theory of seeing]. Łódź: Muzeum Sztuki w Łodzi, 2016. (In Polish)
37. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Culture and Value. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984. (Russ. ed.: Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Kultura i tsennost. O dostovernosti [Culture and Value. On Certainty]. Moscow: AST, 2010). (In Russian)
38. Barthes, Roland. Camera lucida. Paris: Gallimard, 1980. (Russ. ed.: Barthes, Roland. Camera lucida. Moscow: Ad Marginem, 1997). (In Russian)
39. Foucault, Paul-Michel. L’Herméneutique du sujet (1981–1982) [Hermeneutics of the subject]. Paris: Gallimard, 2001 (Russ. ed.: Foucault, Paul-Michel. Germenevtika sub’ekta: Kurs lektsiy, prochitannyih v Kollezh de Frans 1981–1982 uchebnom godu [Hermeneutics of the subject: A course of lectures given at the College de France in the academic year 1981–1982]. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2007). (In Russian)
40. Lotman, Yury. Semiosfera [Semiosphere]. St. Petersburg: Isskustvo-SPB, 2000. (In Russian)
41. Shklovsky, Victor. O teorii prozyi [On the theory of prose]. Moscow: Ardis, 1929. (In Russian)
42. Giroux, Henri A. Border Pedagogy and the Politics of Postmodernism. Social Text 28 (1991): 51–67.
43. Korchalova, Natalia. K probleme diskursivnoj dinamiki pozicii uchastnika obrazovatel’nyh situacij [To the Problem of Discursive Dynamics of the Position of a Participant in Educational Situations]. In: Psihologiya i zhizn: aktualnyie problemyi psihologii obrazovaniya [Psychology and Life: Actual Problems of Educational Psychology]. Minsk: BSU Publ., 2018: 307–312. (In Russian)
44. Klus-Stanska, Dorota. Między wiedzą a władzą [Between Knowledge and Power]. Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji 1–2 (2007): 92–106. (In Polish)
( 785.08 kB ) 
( 766.56 kB )
Issue: 2, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric:
Pages: 18 — 35
Downloads: 698